Jaipur Makaan

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 21 December 2004

The Humourless

Posted on 20:34 by Unknown
Was demoralised yesterday when I discovered a friend of mine does not understand Humour. I don’t mean the Laurel-and-Hardy variety, wherein the Fat One accidentally sits on the Thin One, and most people recognise that now would be a good time to laugh out loud, and in unison. No, I’m talking about that - alas! - rarity: Delicate, Understated Humour (which we’ll henceforth call DUH), the sort that doesn’t need to broadcast itself from a far distance.



Like the first sentence of a comment I posted on this friend’s blog yesterday. (Not revealing details here, though doubtless she’ll hang her head in shame on reading this). It was a black joke that derived its funniness (or so I like to think) from being stated matter-of-factly, unaccompanied by a signboard saying "Laugh here!" Why then should anyone be able to recognise it as a joke, you ask? Well, because of its content, which was plain absurd; it was like nonsense verse, a non-sequitur, a Jabberwocky. If the sentence in question had been meant seriously, it could never have fit in with the frivolous overall tone of the comment.



But this friend mails me saying, "Are you serious? What happened...etc etc." What unnerves me is that she’s very with-it in most other respects, and has a work efficiency that I’m in awe of (incidentally, I came within a couple of months of working directly under her, which we agree would probably have ended the friendship for good).



In fairness though, she’s not the only one to respond thus. Thinking back, some of the most intelligent people I know just blank out when administered a small dose of DUH. Now I’m worried because I often write mails in this vein to friends, and could this be the reason some of them have stopped calling me?



For solace, I turn to Martin Amis. Here is what he has to say about the Humourless:



"Watch the humourless closely: the cocked and furtive way they monitor all conversation, their flashes of panic as irony or exaggeration eludes them, the relief with which they submit to the meaningless babble of unanimous laughter. The humourless can programme themselves to relish situations of human farce or slapstick -- and that’s about it. They are handicapped in the head, or mentally ‘challenged’, as Americans say (euphemism itself being a denial of humour). The trouble is that the challenge wins, every time, hands down. The humourless have no idea what is going on and can’t make sense of anything at all."



(Having said which, I don’t find Amis - or his dad - as funny as many others seem to. But that’s Irony.)

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Wicked Wicket 1: Union-not-so-Jacked
    England’s win in the ICC Champions Trophy against Sri Lanka last evening has given me the long-awaited opportunity for some shameless self-p...
  • Fan fall-oing
    Art Spiegelman’s recently published graphic art compendium In the Shadow of No Towers has as its central theme a paranoia of things suddenl...
  • England, England
    Started Julian Barnes’ 1998 novel England, England last night. Am up to page 65 but may unfortunately have to put it off for awhile, becaus...
  • Why blog?
    Incredibly silly as this will sound, one of the reasons for the unconscionable delay in starting this blog (which I first resolved to do aro...
  • Brevity is the soul of nothing
    When I started blogging, I kept telling myself to post short, snappy blogs rather than analytical, meandering ones. But having seen a number...
  • Gizmo-a-ga-ga
    Interviewed a self-confessed criminal, and an unwitting moron, today. This was for my newspaper, for a column where we profile first-generat...
  • Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
    Most book addicts know about the sinking feeling that sets in around the time one realises that an eagerly anticipated book is going to turn...
  • Talking Hitchcock with Richard Allen
    I’ve been Alfred Hitchcock-crazy for years. I’ve savoured books/collections of writings with deep analyses of his work that critics never mu...
  • Amitava Kumar interview
    Met Amitava Kumar a few days ago for a profile for the magazine. I wasn’t too confident about the interview, having only had a chance to spe...
  • Individual and team
    It was heart-warming to see the little-known Zimbabwean E Chigumbara take the man of the match award for his fine all-round showing against ...

Categories

  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • cricket
  • sports

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2004 (126)
    • ▼  December (25)
      • Why Bob Dylan rules
      • Amu, and the 1984 riots
      • The Humourless
      • Big Deal, says Roosevelt
      • Robert Bloch, Lon Chaney and an elegy for silent f...
      • The one where they all turn 30
      • Rushdie-Dalrymple reading
      • Afternoon at the Golf Club
      • Bad sex award
      • A Sunday interview with Mihir Bose
      • Reading for pleasure: wassat?
      • Poe in the barbershop
      • Tendu’s 34th, and amateur commentators
      • U2 rocks
      • More book lists
      • Ved Mehta's The Red Letters
      • More on movie-watching: a mail exchange with YB
      • Ocean’s Twelve, and ways of watching films
      • Apologies to Triumph the Sock Dog
      • All the world's a copy-cat
      • Indian batting: a passage to greatness
      • Ishiguro, Dylan and celeb reading lists
      • “Golly gee! People read! Books!”
      • The plagiarism debate (contd)
      • The funniest song EVER! (and other scattered thoug...
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ►  September (30)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile