Jaipur Makaan

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 14 September 2004

England, England

Posted on 01:37 by Unknown
Started Julian Barnes’ 1998 novel England, England last night. Am up to page 65 but may unfortunately have to put it off for awhile, because I’ve just been given something else to review, complete with a shockingly unreasonable deadline. But even the little I read included a couple of very interesting passages that gave me pause.



The plot is an intriguing one. (Barnes is especially strong in that area at most times, though I think he sometimes meanders in the actual telling of his stories.) It involves the efforts of a pompous tycoon, Jack Pitman, to create an alternate, quick-fix England on the Isle of Wright. The idea is to provide a tourist spot where visitors can see England not necessarily as it really is, but as it exists in the popular imagination; a survey held to determine the Fifty Quintessences of Englishness throws up, among other items: the Royal Family, Robin Hood and his Merry Men, the White Cliffs of Dover, Big Ben; the Stonehenge; and Thatched Cottages. Pitman and his team now set about recreating these quintessences for easy public consumption.



Naturally, such a venture has rich comic possibilities (small example: the Harrods replica is located inside the Tower of London replica!) but Barnes also makes many poignant observations about nationality, reality and imitation, and the unreliability of our memories. I was very moved by the opening chapter, in which a woman’s childhood memories merge in such a way as to make her believe that the reason her father left the family, when she was a little girl, was to hunt for a jigsaw piece depicting Nottinghamshire (to fit a puzzle showing the English counties).



At a more personal level, my own sightseeing experiences in the UK in May this year lead me to believe that Barnes’ central concept may not be that far-out. I took an eight-day coach tour around the country and while it was an invigorating trip on the whole, I was a little annoyed by the artifice that accompanied many of the tourist show-arounds. In the Shakespeare house in Stratford-Upon-Avon, for instance, the room where the Bard was supposedly born was obviously done up with recent furnishings meant to simulate the actual appearance of the room in the year 1564. The tourist guide herself gave the impression she had done a night-course at the Globe Theatre’s acting academy. With dramatic flourishes aplenty, she mimicked the movements of the midwife who had brought young Will into this world, and explained the precise nature of the delivery. (Bear in mind that many scholars today aren’t even completely sure the man existed in the first place!)



It was much the same story elsewhere. The whole country, at times, seems to be one big tourist spot and the sense of burlesque is all-pervasive. The shadow of the past is inescapable but even more inescapable are the attempts to jazz things up for a modern audience -- to give us 21st century tourists something we can instantly relate to.

In that context, here’s a relevant extract from the book:



"Now the question to be asked is, why do we prefer the replica to the original? To understand this, we must understand and confront our insecurity, our existential indecision, the profound atavistic fear we experience when we are face to face with the original. We have nowhere to hide when we are presented with an alternative reality to our own, a reality that appears more powerful and therefore threatens us..... Now there is the re-presentation of the world.It is not a substitute for that plain and primitive world, but an enhancement and enrichment, an ironization and summation of that world. The world of the third millennium is inevitably, is ineradicably modern, and that it is our intellectual duty to submit to that modernity, and to dismiss as sentimental and inherently fraudulent all yearnings for what is dubiously termed the ‘original’."



The above doesn’t apply just to the re-presentation of England. It’s to be found all around us. We see it all the time, for instance, in historical or period movies where the characters behave not the way they would have done in their own time but in proto-modernist fashion; almost as if they were winking slyly at the audience. You see, we were just like you are, except for the fancy clothes. (Thus the spectators at the Colosseum in Gladiator behave for all the world like football supporters at penalty corner time. Thus Jack the Ripper presciently tells a detective in From Hell, "Decades from now, people will say that I gave birth to the 20th century.")

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Wicked Wicket 1: Union-not-so-Jacked
    England’s win in the ICC Champions Trophy against Sri Lanka last evening has given me the long-awaited opportunity for some shameless self-p...
  • Fan fall-oing
    Art Spiegelman’s recently published graphic art compendium In the Shadow of No Towers has as its central theme a paranoia of things suddenl...
  • England, England
    Started Julian Barnes’ 1998 novel England, England last night. Am up to page 65 but may unfortunately have to put it off for awhile, becaus...
  • Why blog?
    Incredibly silly as this will sound, one of the reasons for the unconscionable delay in starting this blog (which I first resolved to do aro...
  • Brevity is the soul of nothing
    When I started blogging, I kept telling myself to post short, snappy blogs rather than analytical, meandering ones. But having seen a number...
  • Gizmo-a-ga-ga
    Interviewed a self-confessed criminal, and an unwitting moron, today. This was for my newspaper, for a column where we profile first-generat...
  • Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
    Most book addicts know about the sinking feeling that sets in around the time one realises that an eagerly anticipated book is going to turn...
  • Talking Hitchcock with Richard Allen
    I’ve been Alfred Hitchcock-crazy for years. I’ve savoured books/collections of writings with deep analyses of his work that critics never mu...
  • Amitava Kumar interview
    Met Amitava Kumar a few days ago for a profile for the magazine. I wasn’t too confident about the interview, having only had a chance to spe...
  • Individual and team
    It was heart-warming to see the little-known Zimbabwean E Chigumbara take the man of the match award for his fine all-round showing against ...

Categories

  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • cricket
  • sports

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2004 (126)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ▼  September (30)
      • Amitava Kumar interview
      • Fan fall-oing
      • M G Vassanji's The In-Between World of Vikram Lall
      • Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
      • Hitchcock, Notorious and misogyny
      • Excerpt from press release
      • Rahul Dravid biog review
      • Brevity is the soul of nothing
      • Talking Hitchcock with Richard Allen
      • Surviving the aftermath of a car crash
      • Wicked Wicket 2: Why Charu?
      • A blistering cricket report
      • The Dan Brown menace
      • Amrita on 'Blog'
      • Wicked Wicket 1: Union-not-so-Jacked
      • More on M Night S
      • Night in tarnished armour
      • The In-Between World...
      • The Good Doctor - review
      • Damon Galgut
      • Gizmo-a-ga-ga
      • Individual and team
      • England, England
      • Persepolis and Maus
      • Overrated non-fiction
      • On non-readers
      • The Rachel Papers
      • Straw Dogs
      • Time management
      • Why blog?
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile