Jaipur Makaan

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 27 September 2004

Rahul Dravid biog review

Posted on 06:08 by Unknown
Am sitting in office with not too much to do and unbridled access to the sole Internet-blessed comp in our department. So thought I’d post something. This is a review I’d done for the paper a few months ago. In a classic case of self-indulgence, I used it as a pretext for airing some of my cricket views, and only got around to talking about the actual book around three or four paras down. (In my defence, I don’t think the book particularly merited an indepth review.)



Rahul Dravid: A Biography

by Vedam Jaishankar




Jai Arjun Singh



Currently at the apotheosis of his career (or so one supposes), Rahul Sharad Dravid may seem invulnerable to opposition bowlers but he is as vulnerable as any other cricketer to those depressing staples of Indian sports journalism -- the cliche and the compartmentalisation. One doesn’t expect all cricket writers to be Carduses and Arlotts but surely there’s a limit to the number of times the phrases "glorious uncertainty" and "much-vaunted batting lineup" can be employed in match reports. The litany of terms used to describe Dravid -- the Wall, Mr Reliable, a rock in adversity -- come from that same vile canon and serve only to conceal an interesting cricketer behind word arrangements that have, through thoughtless repetition, long ceased to mean anything.



The Dravid legend has grown in the past couple of years, and deservedly so, given his form and achievements during this period. But even as his share in the limelight has increased, the cliches have only become more pronounced.

For instance, one of the most pleasing things about the attention now being given to Dravid is the fact that he isn’t the sort of player the average fan takes instantly to heart. Wide acclaim has come his way against the odds; the sheer level of his performances has made him impossible to ignore, despite his reputation for being an unexciting batsman. But the flip side is that by now all the snivelling about Dravid being an "unsung hero" has reached absurd proportions. (Am I the only one to find it paradoxical that he is repeatedly, and across all media, bemoaned as being "forever in the shadow of other players" in the same match reports that copiously sing his praises -- even to the extent of using his achievements to gloss over the perceived weaknesses of other cricketers.)



Nor has much, unfortunately, been written on what an interesting man this often-dour player appears to be off the field. He is quietly assertive without being over-flamboyant. He speaks well and makes observations that actually give you pause for thought -- check out some of his interviews -- unlike the homilies that are the stock in trade for many other cricketers. He even reads -- Wisden Asia recently featured a column by him on "The Joys of Reading", and slightly pretentious though that was, how many other cricketers do you imagine they could have roped in for such a project?



If I actually come to the biography under consideration so late in this review, that’s only because one can get carried away talking about the many facets of the man -- there’s so much to comment on, so many new angles that can be explored, so many myths to deconstruct and Walls to demolish. Well, the bad news is we’ll have to look elsewhere for the fresh perspective. Like too, too many other recent cricket books (vapid "biographies" of Sachin and Sourav, for instance), Rahul Dravid: A Biography largely misses the man for the cliches and the statistics. (And I’m sure I’ve used those same words before, in reviewing some of those other books. Cliche begets cliche!)



That said, this biography is still readable on the whole, partly because of its first-mover advantage. After all, there hasn’t been much on Dravid in print and Vedam Jaishankar does a decent job of supplying information and anecdotes that weren’t hitherto available in the public domain. The first half has undoubted elements of interest. It’s interesting, for instance, to learn that the seeds of Dravid’s classical batsmanship may have been sown by his father Sharad, an admirer of Vijay Hazare; it’s even more interesting to speculate that his discipline and sense of purpose may have come from his mother, who studied two courses simultaneously despite being from a conservative Marathi family.



There are nice little asides too. One involves the young Rahul bursting into tears during a school match because he lost his wicket to someone else’s lethargic running between wickets; an image easily reconciliable with his intensity as an adult cricketer. Another, possibly apocryphal, remarks on his acute cricketing sense by telling how, as a 14-year-old stripling, he predicted that Sachin Tendulkar would play for India in a couple of years’ time. There’s even a tongue-in-cheek reference to Dravid’s ambivalence towards keeping wickets at junior level, several years before he was asked to do so for India "in the interests of the team".



The last 40 pages or so of the narrative deal with Dravid as an India player; and here, inevitably, the book becomes a ho-hum, by-the-numbers account of various Test and one-day matches, and his contribution to them (or: how a cricket book degenerates into a compendium of match reports). As if that weren’t mundane enough, a 45-page appendage gives us -- what else? -- statistics of his performances, first-class level upwards. But this is compensated to an extent by some very nice photos that mercifully steer clear of showing us just a repertoire of cricketing strokes, and instead provide glimpses of the life behind the facade. Something the text doesn’t do.



As a middlebrow cricket book, Rahul Dravid: A Biography isn’t bad at all, but like many others of its type it leaves you with the niggling feeling that its subject deserves more. There’s hope yet; for there are some fine cricket writers out there, awaiting their turn at the crease -- the Sambit Bals, Sharda Ugras, Rahul Bhattacharyas and Harsha Bhogles -- and one imagines they have books in them. For now this will do, sort of.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in cricket, sports | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Wicked Wicket 1: Union-not-so-Jacked
    England’s win in the ICC Champions Trophy against Sri Lanka last evening has given me the long-awaited opportunity for some shameless self-p...
  • Fan fall-oing
    Art Spiegelman’s recently published graphic art compendium In the Shadow of No Towers has as its central theme a paranoia of things suddenl...
  • England, England
    Started Julian Barnes’ 1998 novel England, England last night. Am up to page 65 but may unfortunately have to put it off for awhile, becaus...
  • Why blog?
    Incredibly silly as this will sound, one of the reasons for the unconscionable delay in starting this blog (which I first resolved to do aro...
  • Brevity is the soul of nothing
    When I started blogging, I kept telling myself to post short, snappy blogs rather than analytical, meandering ones. But having seen a number...
  • Gizmo-a-ga-ga
    Interviewed a self-confessed criminal, and an unwitting moron, today. This was for my newspaper, for a column where we profile first-generat...
  • Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
    Most book addicts know about the sinking feeling that sets in around the time one realises that an eagerly anticipated book is going to turn...
  • Talking Hitchcock with Richard Allen
    I’ve been Alfred Hitchcock-crazy for years. I’ve savoured books/collections of writings with deep analyses of his work that critics never mu...
  • Amitava Kumar interview
    Met Amitava Kumar a few days ago for a profile for the magazine. I wasn’t too confident about the interview, having only had a chance to spe...
  • Individual and team
    It was heart-warming to see the little-known Zimbabwean E Chigumbara take the man of the match award for his fine all-round showing against ...

Categories

  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • cricket
  • sports

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2004 (126)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ▼  September (30)
      • Amitava Kumar interview
      • Fan fall-oing
      • M G Vassanji's The In-Between World of Vikram Lall
      • Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
      • Hitchcock, Notorious and misogyny
      • Excerpt from press release
      • Rahul Dravid biog review
      • Brevity is the soul of nothing
      • Talking Hitchcock with Richard Allen
      • Surviving the aftermath of a car crash
      • Wicked Wicket 2: Why Charu?
      • A blistering cricket report
      • The Dan Brown menace
      • Amrita on 'Blog'
      • Wicked Wicket 1: Union-not-so-Jacked
      • More on M Night S
      • Night in tarnished armour
      • The In-Between World...
      • The Good Doctor - review
      • Damon Galgut
      • Gizmo-a-ga-ga
      • Individual and team
      • England, England
      • Persepolis and Maus
      • Overrated non-fiction
      • On non-readers
      • The Rachel Papers
      • Straw Dogs
      • Time management
      • Why blog?
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile