Jaipur Makaan

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 20 September 2004

The Dan Brown menace

Posted on 05:06 by Unknown
I loved Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code when I read it but as it moves further and further up the all-time bestseller charts (eventually perhaps rivaling the Bible?) I worry about the effect it’s having on people who have never been serious readers but who have devoured this particular book. A racy popcorn-thriller, it’s been easy enough even for those whose idea of heavy-duty reading is Paulo Coelho. The problem is, it’s given far too many people the impression that they’ve actually read something profound, and, worse, something that teaches them something about art and history. This is a reaction that belongs in the same league as the "Brainy stuff!" blurb found on the book jacket. A little knowledge is a very dangerous thing.



And I’m not talking about just dumbsters reacting this way. I’ve had a couple of less-than-exceedingly-stupid friends gush to me about how exciting it is to "learn the truth" about the Holy Grail, the Chalice, Jesus and Mary Magdalene and sundry other concepts they had only vaguely heard of before (if that). People! It’s not the "truth"! No one knows what the "truth" about these things is, and we’re probably never going to know. What Brown has done is to write a very entertaining work of fiction, based on theses already set out in much more academic fashion by other researchers/scholars/conspiracy theorists. The best thing that can be said about his endeavour from a "serious" perspective is that it encourages a re-look at conventional readings of history that have been handed down to us. And that’s always a good thing: it never hurts to be reminded that history as we know it has been written by the victors and one mustn’t take any of it at face value. But embracing conspiracy theories unquestioningly is equally silly.



As things stand, I find myself amused by, but also a little queasy about, the reports in sundry newspapers about the inflow of tourists to the Louvre rising significantly in recent months -- and worse, how guides in the venerable museum have to contend with questions from gullible Code-buffs to the tune of: "Can you show us the exact spot where the curator’s body was found?" Call me snootish, but it’s a little unsettling when people are given "culture" in easy, painless doses.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Wicked Wicket 1: Union-not-so-Jacked
    England’s win in the ICC Champions Trophy against Sri Lanka last evening has given me the long-awaited opportunity for some shameless self-p...
  • Fan fall-oing
    Art Spiegelman’s recently published graphic art compendium In the Shadow of No Towers has as its central theme a paranoia of things suddenl...
  • England, England
    Started Julian Barnes’ 1998 novel England, England last night. Am up to page 65 but may unfortunately have to put it off for awhile, becaus...
  • Why blog?
    Incredibly silly as this will sound, one of the reasons for the unconscionable delay in starting this blog (which I first resolved to do aro...
  • Brevity is the soul of nothing
    When I started blogging, I kept telling myself to post short, snappy blogs rather than analytical, meandering ones. But having seen a number...
  • Gizmo-a-ga-ga
    Interviewed a self-confessed criminal, and an unwitting moron, today. This was for my newspaper, for a column where we profile first-generat...
  • Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
    Most book addicts know about the sinking feeling that sets in around the time one realises that an eagerly anticipated book is going to turn...
  • Talking Hitchcock with Richard Allen
    I’ve been Alfred Hitchcock-crazy for years. I’ve savoured books/collections of writings with deep analyses of his work that critics never mu...
  • Amitava Kumar interview
    Met Amitava Kumar a few days ago for a profile for the magazine. I wasn’t too confident about the interview, having only had a chance to spe...
  • Individual and team
    It was heart-warming to see the little-known Zimbabwean E Chigumbara take the man of the match award for his fine all-round showing against ...

Categories

  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • cricket
  • sports

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2004 (126)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ▼  September (30)
      • Amitava Kumar interview
      • Fan fall-oing
      • M G Vassanji's The In-Between World of Vikram Lall
      • Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
      • Hitchcock, Notorious and misogyny
      • Excerpt from press release
      • Rahul Dravid biog review
      • Brevity is the soul of nothing
      • Talking Hitchcock with Richard Allen
      • Surviving the aftermath of a car crash
      • Wicked Wicket 2: Why Charu?
      • A blistering cricket report
      • The Dan Brown menace
      • Amrita on 'Blog'
      • Wicked Wicket 1: Union-not-so-Jacked
      • More on M Night S
      • Night in tarnished armour
      • The In-Between World...
      • The Good Doctor - review
      • Damon Galgut
      • Gizmo-a-ga-ga
      • Individual and team
      • England, England
      • Persepolis and Maus
      • Overrated non-fiction
      • On non-readers
      • The Rachel Papers
      • Straw Dogs
      • Time management
      • Why blog?
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile